A Minnesota Federal District Court recently ruled that, consistent with some other opinions, after acquired evidence of purported misrepresentation on a health history form (alcoholism), might limit remedies, but could not be used to defeat a drug dependency claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Human Rights Act. The employee in question had significant problems over a long period of time involving alcohol and apparently meth. However, the wording of the health history form did not raise specific issues as to whether alcohol or drug use was over some significant period of time, but rather only current use could be suggested by the poorly worded health history form. Further, this employee had been told by a human resource person that he would be given family medical leave and that representation also could possibly lead to a promissory estoppel claim by the employee. Seegert v. Monson Trucking, Inc. (Minn. D.C. 2010).