Here’s What To Consider When Implementing Flexible Work Arrangements
Bring this vision to reality in your workplace
Posted on 06-17-2022, Read Time: 6 Min
Share:
As an organization grows and evolves its strategies and operations, providing employees with the option to choose where they work is having a significant impact on attracting and retaining the best talent. Relocation costs can be substantial, and for many workers, the disruption to family and personal life is not worth significant and frequent changes. Many companies like Spotify, Atlassian, Twilio, and VMware have already loosened their policies to make many roles available for flexible and virtual (remote) work. Removing the traditional boundaries defined by the physical locations allows these companies to access the full breadth of talent available in their countries of operation.
Increased visibility of the location options and the composition of future workforces require recruiting and hiring today with a clear understanding of what is necessary to produce future experts and leaders. This approach reduces the cost of external hiring at the mid-and senior level, while also improving the career prospects for emerging talent within the company.
Another added benefit is accelerating the representation of diverse talent at the mid-and senior levels of the company – improving equity of compensation and attracting more diverse workers. That’s a strategic benefit because 78% of U.S. workers say it is important that their companies foster an inclusive and equitable environment (April 2021 CNBC/SurveyMonkey workforce happiness index).
Increased visibility of the location options and the composition of future workforces require recruiting and hiring today with a clear understanding of what is necessary to produce future experts and leaders. This approach reduces the cost of external hiring at the mid-and senior level, while also improving the career prospects for emerging talent within the company.
Another added benefit is accelerating the representation of diverse talent at the mid-and senior levels of the company – improving equity of compensation and attracting more diverse workers. That’s a strategic benefit because 78% of U.S. workers say it is important that their companies foster an inclusive and equitable environment (April 2021 CNBC/SurveyMonkey workforce happiness index).
The key objective of workforce planners is to ensure that the future workforce of a company is developed with emerging talent at the forefront and includes a flexible location strategy that supports employee choice and benefits. A lot was learned during 2020 and 2021 when work-from-home was the company-wide policy. In this post, I’ll share a process you can use to bring this vision to reality in your workplace.
Where to Start
Begin by delivering a simple snapshot of your workforce including location (organized into state/country/regional hierarchies), organization (using financial or HR reporting hierarchies), and job level (using compensation guidelines or job libraries). For this, you can integrate your HRIS data, preferably through automated daily feeds. To expedite, consider adapting an existing. Next, create the views and metrics that make the most sense to your HR teams.
By building calculations for annual hiring, termination, and promotion rates (with differences statistically significant) into your model, your model can project the baseline workforce forward for several years.
Next, create scenarios that narrate different growth trajectories (e.g., higher revenue growth, increased product development, or both simultaneously) by the organization, location, and level.
Some examples are:
Scenario #1: Accelerated growth for emerging talent requires higher investment in training.
Scenario #2: Ramping up emerging talent slowly means externally hiring more mid-level managers.
Scenario #3: Incorporate a flexible working policy based on research like this from Gallup, where 54% of software engineers prefer to work virtually, providing increased access to diverse talent across the country.
Scenario #4: Demonstrate the tradeoffs of shifting hiring to lower-cost locations vs. high-cost locations over time.
Scenario #5: Show the implications of improved hiring and promotion rates at all levels for the leadership representation of women and other under-represented groups over time.
Using “what-if” modeling to experiment with these ideas, you will find several scenarios that describe possible futures for your workforce under various conditions of growth, distribution and investment in emerging talent. Our team developed such a baseline model in close collaboration with planning teams from Finance & Real Estate, and then shared it with HR and company leadership teams.
By building calculations for annual hiring, termination, and promotion rates (with differences statistically significant) into your model, your model can project the baseline workforce forward for several years.
Next, create scenarios that narrate different growth trajectories (e.g., higher revenue growth, increased product development, or both simultaneously) by the organization, location, and level.
Some examples are:
Scenario #1: Accelerated growth for emerging talent requires higher investment in training.
Scenario #2: Ramping up emerging talent slowly means externally hiring more mid-level managers.
Scenario #3: Incorporate a flexible working policy based on research like this from Gallup, where 54% of software engineers prefer to work virtually, providing increased access to diverse talent across the country.
Scenario #4: Demonstrate the tradeoffs of shifting hiring to lower-cost locations vs. high-cost locations over time.
Scenario #5: Show the implications of improved hiring and promotion rates at all levels for the leadership representation of women and other under-represented groups over time.
Using “what-if” modeling to experiment with these ideas, you will find several scenarios that describe possible futures for your workforce under various conditions of growth, distribution and investment in emerging talent. Our team developed such a baseline model in close collaboration with planning teams from Finance & Real Estate, and then shared it with HR and company leadership teams.
Decide on the Most Favorable Path
Once you have developed your baseline model, add more context based on your organization’s unique challenges. This helps you land on the preferred long-range plan for the optimal ability to attract and retain talent while staying within cost and contractual constraints. Do this in partnership with finance and real estate teams that already have their perspectives on future expenses and real estate constraints for the organization.
You can add a variable to show the mix of employees in each country that will be office-based or virtual/remote. This enables you to estimate a budget that allows remote employees to travel one or two times per year to work with their teams in person as well as examine the capacity requirements for specific offices, estimate relocation budgets, and measure the environmental impacts of reduced commuting requirements.
You can include the external talent market data (e.g., U.S. Census workforce data on race/ethnicity) that shows the profile of talent across the countries where you operate (or wish to operate) and set expectations for the future set of candidates and hires that you should be able to attract given an increased number of roles that are open to virtual/remote work.
You can work with finance and emerging-talent recruiting teams, as well as each of the business leaders, to set goals for building an emerging talent pool from universities, apprentice programs, internships, boot camps, military exits, and second-career candidates that will enter the workforce in future fiscal years and can reduce demand for external hiring at the mid-and senior levels.
In the first year, the results of such a long-range workforce plan can then be connected to short-term planning and budgeting cycles to inform overall employee expense cost expectations. It can even be expanded to include real estate, IT, and recruiting capacity expenses.
As the organization evolves, update the underlying rosters and assumptions (through automatic, statistical, or manual input) in the model so that it can be used by leadership teams for more detailed organizational planning and “what-if” scenarios.
This extensible, connected approach empowers leaders and their teams to see the future through one common framework. Companies can increase diversity, decrease wasted time, and improve productivity by investing in an emerging talent program that allows the use of mid-level workers for more specialized work, leading to more employee satisfaction.
The original article can be found here.
You can add a variable to show the mix of employees in each country that will be office-based or virtual/remote. This enables you to estimate a budget that allows remote employees to travel one or two times per year to work with their teams in person as well as examine the capacity requirements for specific offices, estimate relocation budgets, and measure the environmental impacts of reduced commuting requirements.
You can include the external talent market data (e.g., U.S. Census workforce data on race/ethnicity) that shows the profile of talent across the countries where you operate (or wish to operate) and set expectations for the future set of candidates and hires that you should be able to attract given an increased number of roles that are open to virtual/remote work.
You can work with finance and emerging-talent recruiting teams, as well as each of the business leaders, to set goals for building an emerging talent pool from universities, apprentice programs, internships, boot camps, military exits, and second-career candidates that will enter the workforce in future fiscal years and can reduce demand for external hiring at the mid-and senior levels.
In the first year, the results of such a long-range workforce plan can then be connected to short-term planning and budgeting cycles to inform overall employee expense cost expectations. It can even be expanded to include real estate, IT, and recruiting capacity expenses.
As the organization evolves, update the underlying rosters and assumptions (through automatic, statistical, or manual input) in the model so that it can be used by leadership teams for more detailed organizational planning and “what-if” scenarios.
This extensible, connected approach empowers leaders and their teams to see the future through one common framework. Companies can increase diversity, decrease wasted time, and improve productivity by investing in an emerging talent program that allows the use of mid-level workers for more specialized work, leading to more employee satisfaction.
The original article can be found here.
Author Bio
![]() |
Rupert Bader is the Vice President, Human Capital Planning at Anaplan, where he leads Anaplan’s workforce planning approach and solutions internally, as well as partnering with the Workforce Planning solutions team to connect Anaplan’s capabilities with customer, partner and prospect use cases. Building on his leadership roles in workforce planning and analytics at Expedia, Microsoft, Avaya and other global organizations, Rupert is driven by his mission to help all organizations create inclusive, productive and dynamic workforces through exceptional Connected Planning. Visit www.anaplan.com/ Connect Rupert Bader |
Error: No such template "/CustomCode/topleader/category"!