What An Employee Engagement Survey Should Look Like
Posted on 07-10-2018, Read Time: Min
Share:
Theoretically, we all know that ‘employee engagement’ is a good thing for our organization. However, how do we define, measure, and improve such a complicated metric? Putting together a good employee engagement survey, or series of surveys, is a good place to start. However, the best way to do this is still hotly contended amongst HR experts, with some even suggesting that we can’t measure engagement at all.
Today, we’re looking at a few different views on employee engagement, and thinking about how you might use a survey to measure, analyze, and improve it.
Today, we’re looking at a few different views on employee engagement, and thinking about how you might use a survey to measure, analyze, and improve it.
Is Employee Engagement Impossible to Measure?
According to leading HR influencer Professor Rob Briner, employee engagement is practically impossible to measure, because there is no centrally agreed definition.
“This definitional mess must not be ignored or trivialized” writes Rob Briner, in his article ‘Don’t believe the hype of employee engagement’. “Without a clear and agreed definition of engagement, we literally do not know or understand what we’re talking about or doing.”
This means that putting together an employee engagement survey is a lot less straightforward than if we were measuring something more objective and easily defined, such as absence or retention.
“This definitional mess must not be ignored or trivialized” writes Rob Briner, in his article ‘Don’t believe the hype of employee engagement’. “Without a clear and agreed definition of engagement, we literally do not know or understand what we’re talking about or doing.”
This means that putting together an employee engagement survey is a lot less straightforward than if we were measuring something more objective and easily defined, such as absence or retention.
What Employee Engagement Means to Most Employers
I don’t believe engagement is impossible to measure and improve. However, I do agree with Rob Briner, that without an agreed definition, there’s no way of knowing exactly which target you’re trying to hit.
In its broadest terms, the CIPD explains employee engagement as “a range of established concepts, including job satisfaction, motivation, work effort, organizational commitment, shared purpose, energy, and flow”. They add that it can also describe an internal state of being, including behavior such as ‘going the extra mile’.
In my own experience, the phrase ‘organizational commitment’ seems to resonate with most employers I speak to. I’ve found this to be what many employers really mean when they talk about employee engagement. And it fits quite well with Khan’s theory of employee engagement, 1990, in which he describes an engaged employee as “one who is fully absorbed by, and enthusiastic about their work”.
Of course, this is all still very hard to measure. It’s extremely broad and subjective. You can’t simply send out an employee engagement survey asking: “How committed are you to your organization?”
Well you can. However, you can’t expect to get much information of value in return – because commitment will mean different things to different people.
In its broadest terms, the CIPD explains employee engagement as “a range of established concepts, including job satisfaction, motivation, work effort, organizational commitment, shared purpose, energy, and flow”. They add that it can also describe an internal state of being, including behavior such as ‘going the extra mile’.
In my own experience, the phrase ‘organizational commitment’ seems to resonate with most employers I speak to. I’ve found this to be what many employers really mean when they talk about employee engagement. And it fits quite well with Khan’s theory of employee engagement, 1990, in which he describes an engaged employee as “one who is fully absorbed by, and enthusiastic about their work”.
Of course, this is all still very hard to measure. It’s extremely broad and subjective. You can’t simply send out an employee engagement survey asking: “How committed are you to your organization?”
Well you can. However, you can’t expect to get much information of value in return – because commitment will mean different things to different people.
Don’t Measure Engagement – Measure the Ingredients for Engagement
If employee engagement can mean different things to different people, and if engagement itself is difficult to directly measure, then you might actually find that it helps you more to measure the various elements that contribute to your ideal definition of an ‘engaged employee’.
Research by Office Vibe suggests that your employee engagement survey should focus on measuring the following 10 key areas:
Research by Office Vibe suggests that your employee engagement survey should focus on measuring the following 10 key areas:
1. Feedback
2. Recognition
3. Happiness
4. Relationship with peers
5. Relationship with managers
6. Personal growth
7. Alignment
8. Satisfaction
9. Wellness
10. Ambassadorship
This could include questions such as:
- How well do you feel your hard work is recognized?
- How happy do you feel at work?
- How proud do you feel to represent our brand?
These questions are still quite subjective, but they are more focused. A sliding scale, such as a rating from 1-5, is a good way to quantify your results. And although questions like this might not necessarily give you a yes or no answer to the question of “are my employees engaged?”, they could still help you to boost your employees’ commitment to your brand – as long as you act on the feedback, and put measures in place to improve the areas where scores are lower.
Don’t Restrict your Employee Engagement Survey to Once a Year
There’s another problem with employee engagement surveys. Answers can be wildly different depending on the time of year, month, or even day. An employee who has just had an argument with their manager, might not rate their relationship with their manager very highly – even if they get along fine almost all of the time.
For this reason, the traditional annual survey alone, is considered by most to be an outdated and ineffective idea. It should be mixed with more ‘in the moment’ methods of gathering feedback, such as pulse surveys. This gives you a more balanced result.
This article originally appeared here.
For this reason, the traditional annual survey alone, is considered by most to be an outdated and ineffective idea. It should be mixed with more ‘in the moment’ methods of gathering feedback, such as pulse surveys. This gives you a more balanced result.
This article originally appeared here.
Author Bio
|
Sat Sindhar is currently serving People HR as a Managing Director. His expertise honed over the last 25 years has been firmly grounded in the fields of Business Operations and Human Resources.
Visit www.peoplehr.comConnect Sat Sindhar |
Error: No such template "/CustomCode/topleader/category"!
