Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Dodging Duties Hurts Bottom Line, Not Just Morale
Created by
Press Releases
Content
NEW YORK, November 21, 2013 – Avoiding responsibilities hurts overall organization performance, not just the goodwill of co-workers, according to a survey by AMA Enterprise, a division of American Management Association. The survey probed the organizational impact of a widespread ‘pass-the-buck’ culture.
Executives, managers and employees from more than 500 U.S. companies participated in the survey and were asked:
In your opinion, what is the impact of avoiding responsibility at your organization?
(Choose as many as apply)
It damages overall performance. 69%
It is resented by co-workers. 55%
It reflects a lack of shared responsibility. 50%
It diminishes a sense of engagement 44%
It is seldom noticed. 8%
“Employees understandably become resentful when they see co-workers shirking responsibility without accountability—in such a situation, organizational morale and, ultimately, performance cannot help but suffer,” said Sandi Edwards, Senior Vice President for AMA Enterprise which provides organizations with assessment, measurement and tailored training solutions.
According to Edwards, avoiding one’s responsibilities may be infectious. “A culture that tolerates ‘passing the buck’ alienates those employees who give everything to their job on a daily basis—these employees may rightfully feel they are being taken advantage of as they take on more and more responsibility to compensate for those who are not fully-engaged.”
Edwards also warned that such a situation “risks the creation of a vicious cycle in which the fully-engaged disengage, having lost the sense of shared responsibility critical to organizational success. A few shirkers can snowball until the dominant culture becomes one of risk- and responsibility-aversion.”
While avoiding responsibility is nothing new, the findings hint that the challenge may be getting worse, observed Edwards.
In your experience, how often do employees at your organization
“pass the buck” and avoid responsibility?
More often than in the past. 28%
About as often as in the past. 49%
Less often than in the past. 22%
Don’t know 2%
Although Edwards believes accountability must be a guiding value for any enterprise when dealing with this issue, she also encourages organizations to use a positive approach when re-engaging specific employees. “Of course people need to be held to account, but at the same time they should be encouraged and supported as they face the risks inherent in taking on greater responsibility.”
At the same, added Edwards, “Management must examine and take responsibility for the messages it sends out. If the culture is all about avoiding risk, the employees cannot be blamed for being likewise.” In this kind of situation, according to Edwards, “before employees can be held accountable and re-engaged, the culture has to change, and that initiative must start at the top. Top management must develop and model a culture that supports and rewards those who take responsibility. The ideal is genuine collaboration, innovation and accountability. And great organizations demonstrate all three.”
The survey was conducted in the spring of 2013 and consisted of 562 senior-level business, human resources, management professionals and employee contacts drawn from the AMA database of contacts.
With more than 90 years’ experience and headquartered in New York, American Management Association is a global leader of comprehensive talent development. AMA Enterprise, a specialized division of AMA dedicated to building corporate and government training solutions, transforms enterprise-wide talent to fuel a culture of innovation, high performance and optimal business results.
Media Contact: Phil Ryan, 845-339-7858, pgryan@aol.com.
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.