Derek Irvine

In a recent article in BusinessWeek, Michelle Conlin wrote well on the link between employee engagement and the bottom line, citing examples from Campbell Soup, Best Buy and JC Penney.

But it’s her final point, based on an example from Stryker, a medical technology company, that is critical yet rarely raised in discussing how to create an environment in which employees can become engaged.

Quotation

At Stryker, pay and promotions are based in part on the engagement scores of a manager's direct reports. That, in essence, forces the bosses to double as optimism ministers. Says Rude: "People get jobs and lose jobs because of their ability to engage teams."

The debate continues to rage on who is responsible for employee engagement – the company or the employee. I believe the company is responsible for creating an environment in which an employee wants to and can engage. Stryker has achieved a nice balance and clearly understands that managers are the front line for creating an “engaging environment.” Our strategic recognition approach strongly advises managers be held accountable through KPIs or MBOs to ensure they are actively, continually and appropriately recognizing employees for the behaviors and actions that demonstrate the company values in achievement of the strategic objectives. Managers should also be held accountable for encouraging their employees to recognize peers as well.

By fostering a culture of appreciation, companies also create environments in which employees understand the importance and value of their everyday efforts in the company’s success. What could be more engaging than that?