Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
EITHER YOU MANAGE YOUR CULTURE, OR…
Created by
Kathie Bloom
Content
Countrywide Financial—the nation’s largest mortgage lender, now a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America—began writing riskier and riskier loans in 2005, a practice it continued through 2007. Sadly, driven by an apparent unrestrained ambition to build the company's market share, Countrywide became a culture out of control. Seemingly overnight, a company that appeared to be an underwriter of prime quality mortgages changed into a company that was taking reckless risks in order to fuel growth and expansion. “Flying blind,” “toxic,” and “poison,” became just a few of the tags used to describe Countrywide’s new lending practices and changed culture. As a result, three of Countrywide’s former executives—CEO Angelo Mozilo, COO David Sambol, and CFO Eric Sieracki—were recently charged with securities fraud for misleading investors about the company’s credit risks. It’s the now all too familiar story of a culture that changed quickly, straying from its core competence and legitimizing a shift in behaviors and thinking throughout the organization that moved the company in a direction that ultimately sabotaged results. What does the Countrywide case prove? Either you manage your culture or it will manage you.
In our work with organizations all over the world, we meet many managers who have learned this lesson the hard way—through the experience of disappointing results. Daily, we speak to leadership teams that are wrestling with the impact their culture is having on the results of their organization; and the stories from people at every level, of the organization describing how the company’s culture has gotten in the way of getting results are endless. Organizations seek stronger customer focus, but can’t establish it. They desire more diversity, but can’t develop it. They insist on better regulatory compliance, but can’t deliver it. They pursue growth, quality, or productivity, but can’t achieve it. Understanding that culture produces results, and then results produce culture is a basic cause and effect connection that every management team needs to make in order to keep the culture, and the results they want, on track. This connection between a company’s culture and a company’s results is well documented with numerous case studies from some of the most successful companies in the world in our book, Journey To The Emerald City: Achieve a Competitive Edge By Creating A Culture Of Accountability.
Broadly speaking, the most effective culture an organization can develop is what we call a Culture of Accountability.TM In such a culture, everyone assumes personal accountability for achieving the organization’s targeted results by connecting the dots between their daily work and what the organization wants to achieve. Accountability, in its truest sense, does not mean what it too often means in business: Who fouled up? Who’s to blame? Who should be punished? Instead, it means that every individual assumes personal accountability to think and act in ways that will achieve the company’s desired results. The key is that they assume accountability, rather than have it placed or forced upon them. They are not commanded to be accountable, nor are they kept under surveillance and then “called to account” for their actions. Everyone continually asks: “What else can I do to drive results?” This question becomes a mantra for those working in a Culture of Accountability and proves to be an effective cure for Blamestorming or Victim-speak. But it doesn’t happen miraculously or without a lot of hard work. Company leaders can create a Culture of Accountability by using a simple model of how culture works and how it can be changed—we call this model The Results Pyramid.
Results sit at the top of The Results Pyramid. The other three elements—actions, beliefs, and experiences—are foundational layers upon which results are based. For a company to achieve targeted results, its culture—what people think and do—must become aligned with those results. When an organization is out of alignment—the actions, beliefs, and experiences of its people are out of sync or conflicting with targeted results—it can never fully achieve the results it seeks. Conversely, when a company is in alignment—people’s actions, beliefs, and experiences are in harmony and consistent with targeted results—it will almost always achieve the results it seeks. Moreover, this alignment of actions, beliefs, and experiences must apply from person to person and across all organizational functions if the company is to consistently achieve its targeted results. The more powerfully aligned a culture, the more intense its focus on results. And the more intense the focus on targeted results, the more prepared and bound for achieving them.
After creating a culture aligned with results, leaders must work hard to keep it aligned by saying and doing things—i.e., create experiences to generate or reinforce beliefs that motivate actions—that continue to produce the desired results. Additionally, they must avoid saying and doing things that may push or twist the culture out of alignment as in the case of Countrywide Financial. Once Countrywide’s leaders took their culture in the wrong direction; it began taking them in the wrong direction. Culture is always at work—sending its signals of how people in the organization should think and act. Paying attention to those signals and making sure they are the right ones—i.e., signals that focus people on doing the things that produce the desired results—should be a fundamental and routine part of the management process.
In our latest book
, How Did That Happen?
, we show readers how to create an organizational culture where accountability for results is front and center, receiving management’s full attention in a positive and principled way.
Roger Connors and Tom Smith are the authors of the bestselling books,
The Oz Principle
and
Journey to the Emerald City
, and Co-Presidents of Partners In Leadership, Inc., the worldwide leader in Accountability Training. ©2009 Partners In Leadership. Above The Line®, Below The Line®, How Did That Happen? ®, The Oz Principle® are all Trademarks of Partners In Leadership.
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.