Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A few interesting tidbits from the report:
Following up on my comments in Monday’s post that there is no single definition for engagement, Aberdeen offers this one:
I would argue true engagement goes a step further such that employees give additional discretionary effort. This additional effort, in alignment with the strategic objectives of the organization, is what delivers those needed business results.
Aberdeen goes on to identify three attributes of an engaged workplace – meaningful work, aligned goals/values, and strong leadership. These three are best summarized in the report with this statement:
Per the report, achieving engagement requires executive sponsorship (“Best-in-Class organizations are far more likely to have a senior business leader, the CEO or President of the company, championing engagement efforts.”), measurement (“Employee engagement efforts must be managed and measured in terms of business impact. Best-in-Class organizations are 29% more likely than Industry Average organizations to have a standard process to measure engagement.), and a system to recognize the right behaviors (“When individuals are recognized for exhibiting the right behaviors and achieving business goals is reward visibly, it has a positive impact on that individual and serves as an example for others in the organization.’)
Would your organization be considered “Best in Class” according to Aberdeen’s criteria of meaningful work, alignment of goals and values and strong leadership? Do you have executive sponsorship of engagement efforts, a consistent measurement structure, and a tool to recognize the right behaviors? Where do you need help or improvement?