Talent in an organisation is susceptible to inconsiderate handling. An ill-managed talent will always contribute to the regretted attrition levels of the organisation. The widely used saying ‘Employees quit bosses, not organisations!’ drives home this point all too clearly.
Talent in any organisation is the ability of its workforce to exceed expectations and deliver value consistently. In an era when technology, strategy or quality benchmarks can be emulated, it is the talent that provides the requisite sustainable competitive advantage for the organisation. In this ‘war for talent’ that has gripped organisations, it is becoming increasing critical to identify the blockages of talent and address them before the actual damage is caused. Conversely it is equally important to identify the talent accelerators to recognize them and reward them for their efforts in developing a robust talent pipeline with a considerable level of stability.
This article in a series, attempts to look at the ‘Satans’ and the ‘Gods’ of Talent Development & Retention in organisations today.
TALENT BLOCKERS!
The dubious distinction of ‘Talent Blocker’ is attributed to those managers who end up in stifling talent and thereby failing to contribute to developing an organization wide talent pipeline. Most times, the talent blockers are not aware of the damage they are causing to the talent ecosystem. It is more to do with the comfort levels and the lack of mentoring and coaching from senior management in terms of fostering talent in the organization. To broadly lay down specific situations when talent blockers thrive, certain obvious areas that result in the blockage of talent have been pointed out:
Recruiting and selecting easy-to manage people
The process of talent blockage manifests at the very beginning of the employee life-cycle when managers tend to recruit candidates who they think will be easy to manage and will be ‘tooth-less’. This happens because a lot of focus is laid down by the senior management on the working relationship between a manager and his subordinates. Having recruited a candidate who will be easy to manage, the manager tends to overshadow the existence of that candidate in the organization there by maintaining a smooth relationship without any ‘ripples’. This is a sub conscious effort by the talent blocker (manager) to ensure his importance in the setup is not undermined and that he continues to call the shots.
Not coaching or mentoring effectively
A majority of successful individuals attribute their professional success to the presence of a coach or a mentor who guided them through rough times. It is this quality that is found missing in a talent blocker. Absence of effective coaching and mentoring practices by managers results in a slow development of the talent under them and there is always a possibility of a stunted career growth for the subordinates in an organization under a manager who is indifferent to the growth and development of individuals.
Lack candor in their feedback
Feedback is a critical tool of correction. But it takes a lot of heart to have your subordinates critique your style of management and to give a frank opinion on the subordinates/ performances. Having said that, a manager who does practice candid feedback programmes benefits not only in improving his own management style but also improves the engagement levels of the employees reporting to him. A talent blocker on the contrary is reluctant to indulge in feedback practices as it involves giving frank opinions on sensitive and personal issues and the blocker is hesitant on issues. It requires getting feedback yourself – and this may not be welcome!
Do not reward differentially for success
Performance if not suitably rewarded will result in demotivation and dip in performance levels. But a talent blocker does not believe in this philosophy. He tends to overlook good performances and believes that such performances will sustain only if the expectations of subordinates are kept in check. This results in the absence of any incentive for the subordinates to perform for the manager or the business and in spite of having promising potential, the subordinates end up as work horses or ‘solid-citizens’ under the talent blocker and eventually quit as a result of pent up frustration.
Horde the people who get the job done
The most common characteristic of a talent blocker is the hoarding of talent and masking it from getting exposed to the talent exchange process. In his selfish bid to maintain performance, a talent blocker tends to horde the talent under him and thereby prevents their progression to lateral movements or promotions. This is the most critical blow that an organisation suffers. On the talent being blocked from further growth by the talent blocker, the subordinates (talent in discussion) tend to get frustrated and end up either as workhorses devoid of any enthusiasm or in more critical cases quit the organisation.
Reference:
Talent Development, Jeffrey Gandz, Ph.D. Professor, Managing Director – Program Design, Richard Ivey School of Business, September 2006, Ivey Executive Development
Posted originally on www.talent2value.com
