Login
Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Study Cites Common Flaws in Diversity Training
Created by
Patricia FitzGerald
Content
Despite the steady growth of diversity and inclusion training the benefit is often diminished by faulty delivery, according to a study by Novations Group, a global consulting firm based in Boston. <br /> <br />When asked about D&I programs provided to their organization, nearly one-third of 2,500 senior human resources executives cited shortcomings such no reinforcement tools or metrics. Other typical flaws were trite content and little thought leadership. <br /> <br />Organizations are sometimes disappointed with diversity and inclusion training they are provided. In your experience, which of the following flaws has your organization encountered?<br /> <br />No tools were provided to reinforce the training. 29%<br /><br />No metrics were offered to evaluate training's effectiveness. 24%<br /><br />Diversity addressed, but not development and advancement issues. 22%<br /><br />Clear objectives were not established. 15%<br /><br />Material was too U.S.-focused. 15%<br /><br />Concerns of line managers were not dealt with. 15%<br /><br />Content was trite, humdrum. 14%<br /><br />Little thought leadership was shown. 9%<br /><br />Facilitation skills were poor. 8%<br /><br />Employer's policies and practices were not addressed. 7%<br /><br />"The findings should serve as a warning to both organizations and D&I program providers, said Novations Vice President Fred Smith. "It's the mistakes and shortcomings identified in the study that create 'diversity fatigue.' The best diversity training has moved far beyond the one-dimensional, feel-good event and today needs to be held to the same rigorous standards as other corporate training. Anything less cheats participants, wastes resources and undermines diversity efforts.<br /><br />According to Smith, some of the deficiencies highlighted in the study apply to training programs in general. "Metrics, reinforcement and objectives are always essential and often lacking, said Smith. "But some issues are particular to diversity training: line manager concerns, focus and the organization's development practices.<br /><br />Middle managers have to become part of D&I planning, even if they do not participate in the actual training, emphasized Smith. "To minimize flaws the Chief Diversity Officer should build relationships with their middle management teams to gain buy-in and long term involvement. Managers need to see a connection with strategic initiatives.<br /><br />Overemphasis on American-style diversity is also a frequent complaint, observed Smith. "What used to be the convention&addressing past grievances and so on&isn't as relevant to the needs of today's workforce mix. Instead, D&I has been redirected to expanding opportunity and leveraging talent as a basic objective.<br /><br />A more fundamental problem, in Smith's view, is diversity programs that simply presume it is just employees who must change. "Nothing significant will be achieved if the organization itself doesn't look at its systems, biases and ways of doing things. There's no return in changing the attitudes or awareness of participants if management also doesn't make some of the right changes. <br /><br />Equation Research conducted the Internet survey of 2,556 senior HR and T&D executives in December 2007.<br /> <br /><font size="1">Novations Group is a leading provider of consulting and training services on four continents. Novations is recognized for its expertise in diversity & inclusion, employee engagement, talent management, employee selection, leadership development, organization communications, sales training and customer service. For more information, visit www.novations.com.</font>
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.