Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Retaining Talent in the Face of Economic Pressure
Created by
Aileen MacMillan
Content
In the U.S., economic pressure is forcing layoffs. Reports, such as those by CNNMoney.com that “employers slash jobs for third straight month while unemployment jumps to 5.1%, a nearly three-year high,
1
demonstrate the depth of the situation.
Yet, intense competition for skilled talent remains, making it imperative for business to attract and retain top performers. Companies are not responding to economic factors by simply cutting costs and employees. A Towers Perrin survey of 650 Canadian and U.S. HR executives showed that “most companies are pursuing a dual agenda of growth amid cost management and increased operational efficiency.
5
A 2008 Manpower Inc.report suggests that organizations not only focus “on the top 10 percent of talent categories, but rather on the entire talent spectrum.
2
And it appears that many organizations are doing just that. Summarizing a Mercer survey with 400 North American companies, Charles T. Scott – worldwide partner and global leader – reports that “64 percent intend to maintain their budgeted staffing levels, 87 percent are not considering any change to their compensation budgets and 93 percent are not instituting any salary freezes at this point.
4
Nonetheless, questions about how compensation will be affected come to mind. According to Watson Wyatt, “organizations that do not balance financial imperatives and employee reward preferences risk losing their best talent.
6
What role will pay for performance play? The same Watson Wyatt report indicates that 51% of managers in “high-performing firms” “link organizational performance to rewards” compared with 38% of managers in other organizations.
6
In addition, Hudson reports that “seventy-nine percent of employees who perceive that their company pays for performance say they are satisfied with their compensation, while 60 percent of those who believe that their company does not reward based on performance are satisfied.
3
If pay for performance is the answer, then a consistent, equitable performance management process that not only helps identify top performers, but can support compensation decisions will be a necessity. Even if pay for performance is not the proposed solution, decision makers must be able to rely on the performance management process to correctly identify skill gaps, top performers and projected skill shortages.
References:
1 Isidore, Chris. “80,000 jobs lost, unemployment spikes.” CNNMoney.com [www.money.cnn.com]. April 4, 2008.
2 Manpower Inc. Confronting
the Talent Crunch: 2008.
Milwaukee, WI: Manpower Inc., 2008.
3 McGowan, Sharon.
2007 Compensation & Benefits Report.
U.S.: Hudson, 2007.
4 Mercer.
HOW TO: Steady as you go: Managing Human Capital in an Economic Downturn.
“Human Capital Perspective” [www.mercer.com]. March 18, 2008.
5 Towers Perrin. “Taking the Pulse of Business and Workforce Challenges” [www.towersperrin.com]. April 2008.
6 Watson Wyatt. “Playing to Win in a Global Economy – 2007/2008 Global Strategic Rewards® Report and Canadian Findings Executive Summary” [www.watsonwyatt.com]. Obtained April 28, 2008.
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.