Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Quasitative Research: Driving a new Culture of Inquiry in HR Management
Created by
S. L. Bender LLC
Content
Quasitative research enables a new culture of inquiry in human resource (HR) management. The term “quasitative” has been around since at least the 1940s, yet the term has been sparsely used. The more familiar terms associated with research in HR management and other fields concerns quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative research is considered a measurable means to objectively define problems and devise solutions, whereas qualitative research is considered an observable means to subjectively define problems and devise solutions. Combining these approaches has been commonly termed “mixed design.” Quantitative and qualitative research in a mixed design constitutes a quasitative approach.
According to Bender (2007), “The general purpose in a quasitative approach is to express its relationship to quantitative and qualitative inquiries in a kind of mixed or quasi (self-styled) approach.” In essence, quantitative research examines subject matter that is measurable, qualitative research examines subject matter that is observable, and quasitative research examines subject matter that is imaginable. Quasitative research may be termed an imaginable approach in that it can aid us in examining the potential in the phenomena in a free-style application (Bender, 2005). It enables a community-based research approach, constituting a kind of partnership in uncovering the past, present, and potential parameters concerning the issue at hand.
Quantitative (measurable) inquiry asks, “What has happened?”
Qualitative (observable) inquiry asks, “What is happening?”
Quasitative (imaginable) inquiry asks, “What will happen?”
In HR management, specialists benefit in asking such questions, bringing pieces, patterns, and pictures into focus. In understanding the issues this “Q3 Inquiries” approach aids in developing problem statements. Quantitative (past), qualitative (present), and quasitative (potential) statements are developed from which a collective declaration (takeaway) is drawn. Such statements are instrumental in defining the organization’s most critical human resource issues. The quantitative, qualitative, and quasitative parameters in Q3 Inquiries have infinite application in HR management. This device can be used with any instrument for nearly any purpose. Its only limitation is one’s imagination and perhaps a willingness to be somewhat visionary (Bender, 2006). In essence, quasitative research engages fact finders in a new culture of inquiry.
Cushman (1999) denotes the meaning of cultures of inquiry as a means to create multiple, flexible structures as they are needed. Multiple forms of assessments continually test existing structures against the organization’s vision. Rather than asking how to make a current structure more efficient or how to put a new one into practice, inquiry cultures ask what problems the old structures solved, what values they reflected, whose interests they served, and what structures might be more consistent with the values and beliefs of the organization’s vision going forward. Cultures of inquiry depend on individuals collaborating in teams and networks setting up critically reflective processes and norms. Cultures of inquiry have sophisticated structures, settings, and processes that support problem-setting (identification), problem-exploring (interpretation), and problem-solving (implementation). In effective cultures of inquiry there is little room for categorical, prescriptive approaches or for traditional ways of choosing among innovations to be implemented. Further, cultures of inquiry create risk-taking and experimental environments that encourage members to develop, reflect on, and modify structures and processes. The larger system must not penalize such risk-taking by creating a high-stakes environment or imposing highly structured or constrained settings for change. Rather, it should support, encourage, and reward creative work.
Cultures of inquiry are highly strategic and purposeful about seeking and utilizing independent information, resources, expertise, and collaborations. Quasitative research in driving a new culture of inquiry engages HR managers in the larger system approach, providing access to information and support, networks for sharing and building knowledge, and non-hierarchical ongoing partnerships.
References
Bender, S. L. (2007). Quasitative research: An historical account. Q3 Inquiries Library. SharonBender.com. http://www.sharonbender.com/quasitative_research_historical_account.htm
Bender, S. L. (2006). Quantitative, qualitative, and quasitative inquiries in human performance technology: Measure the past, observe the present, and imagine the potential. ISPI Performance Improvement Journal. 45(9). http://www.ispi.org/publications/pitocs/piOctober2006.htm
Bender, S. L. (2006). Quasitative inquiry/research/approach: Leading a new culture of inquiry? http://www.sharonbender.com/quasitative_inquiry_research_approach_culture_of_inquiry.html
Bender, S. L. (2005). Quasitative approach, Q3 Inquiries, and 3Rs of research. SharonBender.com.
http://www.sharonbender.com/quasitative_Q3_inquiries_3Rs_research.html
Cushman, K. (1999). The cycle of inquiry and action: Essential learning communities. Horace, (15), 4.
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.