Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
The Newest Pet Rock Needs a Firm Foundation
Created by
Jim Clemmer
Content
<p><span>Process re-engineering is on its way to becoming the latest pet rock of management techniques. </span></p>
<p><span>The reasons for its faddish popularity are clear: it is a way of tackling the enormous problem of flattening our over bloated, inefficient bureaucracies and streamlining the way work is done. </span></p>
<p><span>A 1988 General Electric Co. study of "best practices" in companies such as Ford Motor Co., Chaparral Steel Co., Xerox Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co., as well as Japanese companies, showed that most improvements came by managing across horizontal processes (from order entry through shipping and invoicing), rather than down vertical functions (like marketing, production or accounting). </span></p>
<p><span>That's because customer interactions and work activities flow across the organization, not up and down hierarchies. </span></p>
<p><span>Process re-engineering appeals to quick-fix managers because it aims for striking improvements by blowing up existing structures and procedures, and introducing radically redesigned technology or methods. </span></p>
<p><span>Why go through the pain and hard work of understanding customer needs, or developing improvement plans? Why train teams to analyze and improve processes, or to realign compensation, measurements and other key systems? With a few bold strokes, process re-engineering promises to fix decades-old customs and methods. </span></p>
<p><span>But in fact it becomes a powerful tool only as part of a larger improvement effort. This wider framework is called strategic process management, and it is built on these fundamentals: </span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><span>Improve processes from the outside in. Be very clear about who the process should really be serving - that is, customers, not bureaucrats or management. Determine the customers' most important measures of the process - it may be turnaround time, accuracy rate or some other yardstick. </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>Determine how well the organization is performing according to these measures. Then use this data to establish project goals and continuous improvement targets. </span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><span>Don't let specialists, consultants, or executives re-engineer the processes in isolation. Managers, supervisors and frontline improvement teams must be involved. They can move it beyond being just a project to a continuing management task. </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>The company's core processes, such as the movement of materials, money, customer contacts or information, must be strategically managed for both radical breakthroughs and for long-term continuous improvement. </span></p>
<p><span>I know of one large Canadian retailer that hired high-priced consultants to revamp its logistics operations, including ordering, warehousing, shipping and invoicing. The new process made sense on paper, but the people who had to make it work felt cast aside. Since they didn't "own" the new approach, it wasn't too hard for them to demonstrate how the consultants' ideas didn't work. </span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><span>Make sure everyone involved in outlining, managing, diagnosing and improving the process is well trained. Managers and teams need to know how to collect, analyze and act on data, so that decision-making is based on an accurate picture. </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>Also, ensure that team leaders and members have strong interpersonal skills. They should be able to conduct successful meetings, manage conflict, confront issues and perform as leaders or players. </span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><span>Put executives in charge and hold them accountable. Strategic process management starts at the top with the executive team focusing on the most critical processes that need attention. It must be done within the context of the organization's strategic plan. </span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>Each core process must have an executive "owner" (sometimes the CEO) to put his or her weight behind the effort. The executive makes sure the process team gets the resources and attention needed to break down the "vertical chimneys" of departments. </span></p>
<p><span>The horizontal management of organizations is viewed as an urgent need these days. But companies need to avoid grabbing one tool, expecting it to do the whole job. The French cavalry's motto was "When in doubt, gallop." But managers should have a thoughtful battle plan before they send their troops into the fray. </span></p>
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.