Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
The Bottom-Line Impact Of Key Emergent Practices
Created by
- Spherion
Content
<p>Nearly a decade ago, Spherion began tracking historical changes in America s workforce. From taking control of their careers and the rise of free agency to the increasing emphasis on work/life balance, a growing group of U.S. workers - dubbed <em>emergent</em> workers by Spherion - has developed very different motivations, attitudes and beliefs about work.</p> <p>While this change in beliefs can be threatening to corporations accustomed to employee loyalty, it has nonetheless meshed well with new corporate needs. For just as employees are looking for flexibility in their jobs and work schedules, corporations are seeking greater flexibility in their cost and workforce structures through the increased use of contingent workers.</p> <p>A group of companies - what Spherion calls <em>emergent</em> employers - are proving to be the role models in taking advantage of these trends, adjusting their thinking about employment management and becoming as <em>emergent</em> as their employees. These companies find it easier and more cost-effective to use remote, mobile and contingent workforces, employed for specific projects and time periods. <em>Emergent</em> employers workforce strategies are grounded in a deep understanding of what motivates their workers and how to structure the workforce to achieve the best balance between mission-critical and mission-supportive roles.</p> <p>Recent studies show that becoming an emergent employer is a good business decision as well. According to a study by the University of Southern California, companies utilizing best HR practices had a 60% higher return on sales and a 20% higher return on investment and assets. In addition, a Lehigh University study showed that companies comprised of at least 10% contingent workers realize better financial and share price growth.</p> <p>Unfortunately, many companies today have not embraced an <em>emergent</em> approach to workforce management and are caught in a downward cycle of retrenchment and reassessment that leads inevitably to spiraling turnover expenses.</p> <p>Vital to deploying a workforce strategically is to understand the makeup of the current workforce and compare that to future needs. With that focus, companies can identify gaps and create an organizational roadmap to use in developing workforce models that specify skill types and volume, resource requirements and ratios of management to staff.</p> <p><strong>ACHIEVING A BALANCE OF EMPLOYED & SUPPLIED TALENT</strong></p> <p>The key to building a stable workforce structure, which can weather economic highs and lows, is achieving the right balance of <em>employed</em> and <em>supplied</em> talent. <em><strong>Employed talent</strong></em>are full- and part-time employees who make up the permanent staffand are typically a greater percentage of a business workforce than <em><strong>supplied talent</strong> -</em> the contingent, temporary, contract and outsourced workers who supplement the core workforce.</p> <p>With the right mix of talent, a company has the flexibility to staff up or down without resorting to drastic layoffs. Unfortunately, too few business leaders have a clear understanding of exactly who their employees are. To catapult your organization into the <em>emergent</em> camp, follow the best practices outlined below.</p> <p><strong>Define Core Functions.</strong> Each business segment must be evaluated and its activities divided into core and non-core functions. Once this process is complete, the organization has a detailed inventory of the core activities that must be managed by <em>employed</em> talent and those that are non-core and can be managed by <em>supplied</em> staff.</p> <p><strong>Evaluate Structure. </strong>After core and non-core functions are defined, the next step is to evaluate current workforce alignment. Are there <em>employed</em> workers dedicated entirely to non-core functions? Would dedicating flexible talent to those activities reduce costs and allow the business to focus <em>employed</em> talent on revenue-driving initiatives?</p> <p><strong>Create a Cushion of Flexibility</strong>. Once mission-critical and mission-supportive activities have been identified, <em>emergent</em> organizations can then focus on programs for "employed" talent in mission-critical functions while working with an outside expert to supply mission-supportive talent.</p> <p>Even companies that understand the power of utilizing a contingent workforce for supplied talent remain challenged when it comes to finding the right people, bringing them onboard, providing the proper training and making sure they are assimilated and developed for optimal effectiveness. These are tasks most companies are not set up to handle.</p> <p>As a result, many companies have turned to staffing and recruitment firms to provide employment solutions that help them structure, acquire and manage their workforce for maximum productivity and profitability. When the HR department can focus on strategic imperatives because service providers are focused on fulfilling the strategic mandates defined by the corporation, that corporation can control the overall costs of hiring and enhance the revenue potential inherent in having the right employee in the right place at the right time.</p> <hr /> <p><em>Richard Lamond is the Senior Vice President & Chief Human Resources Officer of Spherion Corporation (NYSE:SFN). He can be contacted at 954-308-7600 or via email dicklamond@spherion.com. More information on Spherion is available online at <a href="http://www.spherion.com/">www.spherion.com</a>.</em></p>
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.