Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Trials Can Be Won Before They Begin
Created by
- M. Lee Smith Publishers
Content
<p><font class="byline"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Excerpted from <a href="http://www.hrhero.com/txemp.shtml?" target="_blank">Texas Employment Law Letter</a>, written by attorneys at the law firm <a href="http://www.employerscounsel.net/bios/txemp.shtml?" target="_blank">Ford & Harrison LLP</a></span></font></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Here's a common lament: <i>If only I knew then what I know now.</i> And we lawyers often hear that right after trial. Trial provides the wisdom of hindsight, and that hindsight is invaluable. Here, then, are some thoughts on things we wished clients had done that would have made their trials a lot more defensible.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Here's the usual drill: An employee is a poor performer. You tell the employee that she isn't meeting expectations, you do it in writing, and you fire her if she doesn't. While that's OK, in the right circumstances, there's a better way.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Talk to the employee about a "mutually agreeable resolution" of the performance difficulties. Frame the issue that way: When you give the employee a written document on her performance, recite how you and the employee discussed the matter and that you came to a mutually agreeable resolution on dealing with the performance issue. Whether you use those words isn't as important as the fact that you communicate the idea. There's a big difference in a juror's mind between a cram down and an acceptance. You get more mileage from the second.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">And while we're at it, remember that how something is said is just as important as what's said. The Tiffany jewelry company understands this with its beautiful blue box. It's the same in dealing with employees. Writing them a five-page memo, even if you're talking about mutually agreeable resolutions, that has only three or four paragraphs and is single-spaced does nothing to help your case.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Provide training for supervisors on how to write memos: Keep them short, keep them clear, and require supervisors to write just like they talk. The problem with writing is that once someone has pen in hand or keyboard front and center, he thinks he needs to sound smart. That's where bad writing comes from. Liberate your supervisors from that tyranny.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Train your supervisors to use bullet points and check marks to make their points. Have them use subheadings as orientation points for the reader. Write to be understood, not to impress.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">When I was a new lawyer at the National Labor Relations Board, I wrote my first legal brief. I thought it was brilliant. My supervisor thought otherwise. Handing it to me, he quietly said, "Write like Ned in the First-Grade Reader: This is Spot. Spot is a dog. See Spot run." While my feathers were ruffled, I followed his advice and hopefully have ever since.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Often, an employee's conduct puts fellow employees at a disadvantage - whether it's excessive absenteeism or tardiness, the failure to timely perform tasks, or the inability to do so. Try using phrases in the memo to the employee about how her conduct affects her fellow employees and why it's important to work as a team, and when the employee doesn't, identify the consequences to her co-workers. Be specific.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">One of the most powerful arguments in front of a jury is that an employee was trying to put her interests above the interests of other employees. When you present that frame to a jury, they think the complaining employee was looking for special treatment.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">Finally, every company should think about doing what my co-editor, Theresa Gegen, calls an "after-action report." She was a captain in the U.S. Army (she served in the first Gulf War and received her airborne badge after jumping out of an airplane five times) and learned this valuable lesson. After every engagement, an after-action report is written - no more than a page or two detailing what occurred and what was done right and what was done wrong and making recommendations on how to improve.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">It's not about finger-pointing for bad or praising for good but learning from the experience. Do an after-action report after any legal issue is over- not just after a trial. Do it even if you've won.</span></p>
<p class="text"><span style=" font-family: Arial; font-size: x-small;">My mother used to say that all experiences are good ones, but only if you draw the right lessons from them - otherwise they're just something that happened to you. Think about these things that we've learned from 25 years of trying cases. Putting them to work for you now may lessen your chance of going to trial and, if you must, improve your chance of winning. To paraphrase Sun-Tzu, all trials are won or lost before they even begin.</span></p>
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.