Tags
Administration
Benefits
Communication
Communication Programs
Compensation
Conflict & Dispute Resolution
Developing & Coaching Others
Employee Satisfaction/Engagement
Executive Coaching
HR Metrics & Measurement
HR Outsourcing
HRIS/ERP
Human Resources Management
Internal Corporate Communications
Labor Relations
Labor Trends
Leadership
Leadership Training & Development
Leading Others
Legal
Management
Motivating
Motivation
Organizational Development
Pay Strategies
Performance Management
Present Trends
Recognition
Retention
Staffing
Staffing and Recruitment
Structure & Organization
Talent
The HR Practitioner
Training
Training and Development
Trends
U.S. Based Legal Issues
Vision, Values & Mission
Work-Life Programs & Employee Assistance Programs - EAP
Workforce Acquisition
Workforce Management
Workforce Planning
Workplace Regulations
corporate learning
employee engagement
interpersonal communications
leadership competencies
leadership development
legislation
News
Onboarding Best Practices
Good Guy = Bad Manager :: Bad Guy = Good Manager. Is it a Myth?
Five Interview Tips for Winning Your First $100K+ Job
Base Pay Increases Remain Steady in 2007, Mercer Survey Finds
Online Overload: The Perfect Candidates Are Out There - If You Can Find Them
Cartus Global Survey Shows Trend to Shorter-Term International Relocation Assignments
New Survey Indicates Majority Plan to Postpone Retirement
What do You Mean My Company’s A Stepping Stone?
Rewards, Vacation and Perks Are Passé; Canadians Care Most About Cash
Do’s and Don’ts of Offshoring
Error: No such template "/hrDesign/network_profileHeader"!
Blogs / Send feedback
Help us to understand what's happening?
Reason
It's a fake news story
It's misleading, offensive or inappropriate
It should not be published here
It is spam
Your comment
More information
Security Code
Spicy Practices Lead to EEOC Lawsuit
Created by
- M. Lee Smith Publishers
Content
<p>Excerpted from <a href="http://www.hrhero.com/txemp.shtml?HLe">Texas Employment Law Letter</a>, written by attorneys at the law firm <a target="new" href="http://www.employerscounsel.net/bios/txemp.shtml?HLe">Ford & Harrison LLP</a><br>
</p>
<p>May 27, 2005</p>
<p>On March 22, the Dallas office of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued Irving, Texas-based Razzoo's Cajun Café for sex discrimination. It's a case with an odd twist, though: The EEOC is claiming that males are the victims - and females the beneficiaries - of the discrimination.</p>
<p><b><i>Bellying up to the bar</i></b></p>
<p>Let's first talk about what the EEOC is claiming. The EEOC suit says that the restaurant chain violated the law through a pattern and practice of firing or refusing to hire and/or promote men for bartender positions. Its evidence? The commission says that Razzoo's had a policy of creating a ratio of 80 percent females to 20 percent males for its bartending staff and that it systematically whittled down its male bartender numbers until they came in line with the mandated gender ratio.</p>
<p>According to the EEOC regional attorney, "Just because a manager or a corporate office believes that a certain race, gender, age or other demographic 'type' is 'what the customers want,' that does not justify discriminatory practices such as this." The suit is a class action, and the commission is seeking relief for all former male bartenders and qualified male applicants for bartender positions.</p>
<p>The company blasted back, denying in a written statement that it discriminates and saying that it has always provided equal opportunity for all applicants and employees. It will now be up to the court, and perhaps a jury, to decide who's right.</p>
<p><b><i>Bottoms up</i></b></p>
<p>This case raises several important points.</p>
<p><i>First,</i> the EEOC is big on cases with marquee value; it makes for a good press release (not to mention a newsletter article) to talk about males being discriminated against in favor of females (sort of like man bites dog). So if you have facts like these, you too may be the subject of an EEOC suit. Beware.</p>
<p><i>Second,</i> seldom is a person's sex a qualification for a job, although in rare instances it may be. For example, just this past year, a court in the Midwest found that it's legal to exclude male employees from working as correctional officers at a female prison because of privacy and security issues. Yet the exception proves the rule. For instance, favoring one gender over another is still unlawful even when based on an employer's concern for the safety of its female employees.</p>
<p>In one famous case, a battery manufacturer enacted a policy prohibiting pregnant women and women capable of bearing children from working in jobs involving lead exposure. The rule's purpose was humanitarian: to protect against any risk or harm to fetuses that female employees might conceive. While the policy was well intended, the court said it was illegal because it wasn't reasonably necessary for the normal production of batteries. To put it another way, fertile women were as efficient manufacturing batteries as anyone else.</p>
<p><i>Third,</i> is it ever lawful to take into consideration the request of customers in deciding whether to hire males or females? We don't think so. Remember Texas-based Southwest Airlines' refusal back in the 1970s to hire male flight attendants? Southwest believed that its mostly male and mostly business passengers preferred young women as flight attendants, arguing it would lose business if the flight attendant position became a coed job. That argument went the way of the go-go boots and miniskirts once worn by the flight attendants.</p>
<p><i>Fourth,</i> this case is a timely reminder that victimized males can sue. It happens, and - when doing your risk assessments - you need to list males as a protected group. For instance, a male is accused of sexual harassment. The female accuser gets an in-depth investigation of her story by the employer, but the male employee gets a bum's rush on his version. In that circumstance (and we've seen it), the male can claim sex discrimination. Remember: Middle-aged white men are a protected class, too.</p>
<p><i>And finally,</i> while you certainly can have outreach programs to increase the diversity of your workforce, be careful about going over the line. Aspirations are fine; quotas aren't. When you find yourself sliding toward the second and away from the first, put on the brakes and reevaluate.</p>
<p>Copyright © 2005 M. Lee Smith Publishers LLC. The above article was contributed by <a href="http://www.hrhero.com/txemp.shtml?HLe">TEXAS EMPLOYMENT LAW LETTER</a>. <a href="http://www.hrhero.com/txemp.shtml?HLe">Click here</a> to read more about the print newsletter and its editors. Texas Employment Law Letter does not attempt to offer solutions to individual problems but rather to provide information about current developments in Texas employment law. Questions about individual problems should be addressed to the employment law attorney of your choice. The State Bar of Texas does designate attorneys as board certified in labor law.</p>
<p><!-- ADDITIONAL RESOURCES GO HERE--><!----></p>
<hr color="#000000">
<p>Additional resources</p>
<p>--><!-- STANDARD NEWSLETTER AD GOES HERE --></p>
Copyright © 1999-2025 by
HR.com - Maximizing Human Potential
. All rights reserved.